What are the advantages and disadvantages of a hands-off, decentralized management approach? Answer — 1 1. A decentralized organization is one in which decision making is not confined to a few top executives rather is throughout the organization, with managers at various levels making key operating decisions relating to their sphere of responsibility. Decentralization is a matter of degree, since all organizations are decentralized to some extent out of necessity.
Such an emphasis is understandable given the enormity of the threat posed by the stance of the North Korean regime to the peace, stability, and many millions of lives in the region.
The major practical responsibility for preventing a nuclear-armed catastrophe lies, after all, on the political and International case restructuring at koreas leaderships of the States involved.
The crisis does, however, possess a significant legal dimension which will condition the actions taken by most of the players in the unfolding drama.
Established as a communist dictatorship during occupation by the Soviet Red Army inNorth Korea invaded its southern neighbour in The invasion was repulsed by a United Nations military force after three years of warfare, in which more than 1.
The fighting was interrupted by an armistice ie, cease-fire agreement between the belligerents. Since at least the early s, North Korea has been developing long-range missile technology capable of delivering nuclear warheads.
The successfully-tested Nodong missile has a range of at least 1, kilometres; ie, far enough to reach South Korea, Japan, parts of the Russian Far East, and northern China. In OctoberNorth Korea conducted its first test of a nuclear weapon.
A second test was conducted in May The Russian Defence Ministry estimated the latter explosion to be times more powerful than the bomb which destroyed Hiroshima. Later the same year, North Korea announced that it possessed a stockpile of nuclear weapons.
As far as North Korea is concerned, therefore, hostilities in the Korean War may now be resumed. These sanctions were directed against North Korea for continuing to develop a nuclear weapons and missile-delivery capability and for proliferating such weaponry to other parts of the world.
State Sovereignty This brings us into direct contact with the legal issues. The starting point for considering whether a State has breached its obligations at international law is always the principle of territorial sovereignty.
Territorial sovereignty has been a cornerstone principle of international law since the emergence of the modern State system in the seventeenth century.
According to this principle, a State is free to do whatever it pleases within its own territory, subject only to specific limitations imposed by international law itself.
Therefore, unless North Korea has violated some specific obligations binding on it under international law, it is free to develop, build and maintain nuclear weapons and missile delivery systems within its territory.
Several other States, such as India and Pakistan, have followed their example. Participation in the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons NPT provides a firm basis for concluding that a non-nuclear State has surrendered its legal freedom to develop and acquire nuclear weapons.
Only a small handful of States are not parties to the NPT.
North Korea acceded to the NPT inbut became in the only State to withdraw from participation. Furthermore, in the International Court of Justice provided to the United Nations General Assembly an advisory opinion in response to the question: Surely, then, North Korea must be within its legal rights to follow the example of other nuclear-armed States.
On the surface, this looks like a straightforward question of the rule of law: How can there be one law for some States, and a different law for others?
This is the way North Korea would like to frame the issue. Indeed, Art 2 of the United Nations Charter places legal obligations on all States to settle disputes exclusively by peaceful means and to refrain from the threat or use of force in their international relations.Restructuring Korea's Financial Sector for Greater Competitiveness.
Marcus Noland (PIIE) Working Paper. In the case of international financial liberalization, the opening of emerging market stock markets has led to systematically higher price-earning ratios permitting firms to increase capital investment and raise the rate of growth.
Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business Volume 26 Issue 3Spring Spring Korea's Competition Law and Policies in Perspective Symposium on . Get the latest international news and world events from Asia, Europe, the Middle East, and more.
See world news photos and videos at timberdesignmag.com International Case - Restructuring at Korea's Daewoo Essay. INTERNATIONAL CASE – RESTRUCTURING AT KOREA’S DAEWOO Question – 1 - International Case - Restructuring at Korea's Daewoo Essay introduction.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of a hands-off, decentralized management approach? INTERNATIONAL CASE – RESTRUCTURING AT KOREA’S DAEWOO Question – 1. What are the advantages and disadvantages of . INTERNATIONAL CASE – RESTRUCTURING AT KOREA’S DAEWOO Question – 1 - International Case - Restructuring at Korea's Daewoo introduction.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of a hands-off, decentralized management approach?
Answer – 1 1. Decentralization. It is the “tendency to disperse decision making .